Return-path: Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:45000 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799Ab1EJSgA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 14:36:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC9858D.5010308@openwrt.org> (sfid-20110510_203604_564355_EFA60C4D) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:35:57 +0200 From: Felix Fietkau MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Greear CC: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: ath5k and ath9k bugs still in 2.6.39-rc7 References: <4DC968FD.1040906@candelatech.com> <4DC97189.1090105@openwrt.org> <4DC97A85.40109@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <4DC97A85.40109@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2011-05-10 7:48 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 05/10/2011 10:10 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2011-05-10 6:34 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>> As far as I can tell, ath5k is critically broken due to un-initilized >>> spinlock (fixed in the patch I posted a few days ago), and ath9k stations >>> won't work due to PS bugs that Felix posted fixes for yesterday. >> Did you test my patch for that? I couldn't reproduce the issue, so I >> couldn't test whether my patch fully fixes it. > > Better hold off on that patch..looks like the culprit. Maybe vif is not NULL but > still bogus? I think I know where the bug is, I'll send a v2 soon. - Felix