Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:61556 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754228Ab1EQNO3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2011 09:14:29 -0400 Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so2062378qyk.19 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:14:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1305631218.4250.0.camel@maggie> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 15:14:28 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110517_151438_080336_5F6779CA) Subject: Re: ssb: how did we get special reject bit for SSB rev 2.3? From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= Cc: b43-dev , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michael Buesch , Larry Finger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 17 maja 2011 13:50 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki napisał: > W dniu 17 maja 2011 13:20 użytkownik Michael Büsch napisał: >> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:40 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> Does anyone know where did we get this from? >> >> Should be in the git history. > > It's here since: > [SSB]: add Sonics Silicon Backplane bus support > > Maybe bcm43xx does contain sth... This check was not present in bcm43xx. So I guess specs were updated and ssb was written basing on updated specs. -- Rafał