Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:42119 "EHLO
	mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751410Ab1ECNUl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 3 May 2011 09:20:41 -0400
Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so19127ewy.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 03 May 2011 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: "Andrew V. Stepanov" <stanv@altlinux.org>
Subject: Re: carl9170.ko RX - DMA, TX - COPY.
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:20:28 +0000
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
References: <BANLkTiniamP_zXeGkW2TgatdkSv1+rdfeg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTiniamP_zXeGkW2TgatdkSv1+rdfeg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-Id: <201105031520.28666.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (sfid-20110503_152050_560133_B7CDD034)
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Tuesday 03 May 2011 12:50:26 Andrew V. Stepanov wrote:
> I'm very surprising, that carl9170.ko uses DMA only for receiving.
Interesting, how do you arrive on the conclusion?

Regards,
	Chr