Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:48565 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761Ab1EJWIQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 18:08:16 -0400 Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so3931716qwk.19 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1304879433-7096-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:08:15 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110511_000819_813755_2E680FBF) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] ssb/b43(legacy): clean dangling cores workarounds From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 8 maja 2011 19:54 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki napisał: > W dniu 8 maja 2011 20:30 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki napisał: >> There is no perfect place for this workarounds, but keeping it in ssb sounds >> more reasonable. > > Uups, I didn't save edition fixing this grammatical mistake. I'm lucky > it won't be visible anywhere in git log :) John: something went wrong there. You applied b43 and b43legacy patches, but they should applied *after* ssb patch I don't see in your tree. I don't know how many people can be affected by this... Can not tell you if we should rebase or just commit ssb patch quickly. -- Rafał