MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19914.42954.285439.226672@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <BANLkTinoAmna3mtMWY2Ai82wbGu-T9FzMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=Z=i9_WoXX=YbQtF-8imKizRPM+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim_uY0Di13RDHZxOpVQZaDfG3hc8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<19903.49991.848934.183819@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<BANLkTi=1E-Ma=N0D-gP_baSjMOvmfM-2KQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=wXtCNY7TUUpfYpHux8piL09+RuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTiknq4jDQY2-z53QXoyHUb4b4=Oojw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=tZDXs=ja+YKXFVyP3FeuxmWLtuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<19908.11423.898062.510184@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<BANLkTin6qOChJQSmjoByS9C2_toFzHNq=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=X+_cQP7RJh9Y4fPQhbJbgfNK6pQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinvVGrVdmku3G6hEmbv+9+nOwnZPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<19912.44045.774181.844464@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<19912.55320.817869.173186@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<19912.55857.505921.694732@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<BANLkTi=d7BfOBH93bDZMUDV2vhbrVtCgGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<19912.57383.634547.405469@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<BANLkTi=BrJPhjA5StJcktkKE7zs3Ob=iOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<19913.25619.615324.60744@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<BANLkTinv0XrfhDZWYpmdzSdVXZCovzhy_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<19914.42954.285439.226672@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:22:42 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=uW+fVNyFJBS0fHMRAQxMKTDgaLw@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110511_174930_050929_238C3338)
Subject: Re: error initializing AR7010+AR9280 Xbox 802.11n adapter
From: George Nychis <gnychis@gmail.com>
To: Sujith <m.sujith@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Davis <marked86@gmail.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven <srumney@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Sujith <m.sujith@gmail.com> wrote:
> George Nychis wrote:
>> Great, thanks Sujith! ?Are we positive that the Xbox adapter is also
>> not UB94 now that we have seen both of these with this problem? ?I am
>> not sure if this was speculation after seeing the initial error, or if
>> it is a known fact.
>
> Yes, the Xbox adapter is not based on UB94.
>
> And apparently no changes are required to use UWA-BR100, as an internal
> engineer was able to use ath9k_htc as is, after adding the PID/VID
> to the driver. So maybe the card that you have bought is different
> from the UWA-BR100 sample that he used. Will poke some more people and
> see if we're missing something.
>

Maybe if we can compare lsusb of both devices to ensure that they are
actually the same.

Could you have him read what the FCC ID is on the back of the stick?
My details are:

IC: 409B-UWABR100
FCC ID: AK8UWABR100
ANATEL: 0010-10-4749