Return-path: Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:1596 "EHLO MMS3.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753561Ab1FFKJ5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 06:09:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4DECA76C.90000@broadcom.com> (sfid-20110606_121004_824717_E0FF15BD) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:09:48 +0200 From: "Arend van Spriel" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= cc: "Hauke Mehrtens" , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Greg KH" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , "mb@bu3sch.de" , "george@znau.edu.ua" , "b43-dev@lists.infradead.org" , "bernhardloos@googlemail.com" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/10] bcma: Use array to store cores. References: <1307311658-15853-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <1307311658-15853-2-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/06/2011 11:42 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Greg, Arnd: could you take a look at this patch, please? > > With proposed patch we are going back to this ugly array and wrappers hacks. > > I was really happy with our final solution, but it seems it's not > doable for embedded systems...? Is there something better we can do > about this? I do agree with Rafał that we should look for another alternative. I posted a suggestion earlier regarding this patch. Can anyone tell me whether that could prevent need for the array/wrapper hack. Gr. AvS -- Almost nobody dances sober, unless they happen to be insane. -- H.P. Lovecraft --