Return-path: Received: from bues.ch ([80.190.117.144]:45389 "EHLO bues.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754900Ab1FZVEh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:04:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:04:25 +0200 From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Larry Finger , wireless , b43-dev Subject: Re: Improvement in b43 on BCM4312 (14e4:4315) Message-ID: <20110626230425.744da739@maggie> (sfid-20110626_230940_741767_42A879FB) In-Reply-To: References: <4E03A25F.7080103@lwfinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:48:59 +0200 Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > Only one of the patches to ssb seems to be the "fix", namely commit eb40e3e8 > > entitled "drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c: uninitilized warning" by > > Connor Hansen. I need to do more tests on this patch, but the kernel from > > Linus's tree could reinstall itself when I added this patch. I see no > > indication in the commit message regarding pushing this one to stable, but I > > think it should go upstream to mainline and the stable trees. > > It does not look like possible fix to me. Plus it sounds like false > warning from compiler. > > Take a look at relation between: > 1) updown_tab and updown_tab_size > 2) depend_tab and depend_tab_size The patch in question does nothing but silence a bogus compiler warning. No logical change to the code.