Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:65345 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751808Ab1GRPoz (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:44:55 -0400 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so1352211ywe.19 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E2454EC.1050900@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20110718_174459_059759_123BD63E) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:44:44 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Assmann CC: ali@internetdog.org, wireless Subject: Re: r8712u issue References: <4E2051F3.20103@redhat.com> <4E205984.5040803@lwfinger.net> <4E23E56C.9000202@redhat.com> <20110718082709.GA8390@internetdog.org> <4E23F2E0.3050200@redhat.com> <4E2448D2.50502@lwfinger.net> <4E244AC6.2030306@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E244AC6.2030306@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/18/2011 10:01 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: > On 18.07.2011 16:53, Larry Finger wrote: >> On 07/18/2011 03:46 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: >>> On 18.07.2011 10:27, Ali Bahar wrote: >>>> Stefan, >>>> >>>> I'd like to reproduce this problem. So I'd appreciate some specifics, >>>> as asked below. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:49:00AM +0200, Stefan Assmann wrote: >>>>> On 15.07.2011 17:15, Larry Finger wrote: >>>>>> On 07/15/2011 09:42 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> driver. The problem I'm currently facing is that the driver does not >>>>>>> recognize any network disconnects. So whenever the network goes down the >>>>>>> driver will still report it's connected and thus doesn't reconnect when >>>>>>> the network is up again. >>>> >>>> >>>>> The system is a headless debian squeeze with a self build vanilla 2.6.39 >>>>> kernel. The network is handled by debian scripts I just added the following >>>>> to /etc/network/interfaces: >>>>> auto wlan0 >>>>> iface wlan0 inet dhcp >>>>> wpa-conf /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf >>>>> >>>>> No NM involved. >>>> >>>> So wpa_supplicant is controlling (and presumably monitoring) the >>>> connection. >>>> How are you seeing that (to quote the above) "the network goes down" >>>> and that the driver reports that "it's connected"? >>>> (Typically, I use only ifconfig and iwconfig, but those don't monitor >>>> the connection.) >>> >>> OK, so I first recognized the problem when I rebooted my AP and the host >>> in question didn't get back online. Checking the host itself it seemed >>> that the network is doing fine, ifconfig showed the interface has an IP >>> but I couldn't ping any hosts. After an ifdown ; ifup cycle everything >>> was back to normal. >>> I pulled the power from the AP, waited a few minutes and checked back. >>> The ifconfig output still showed that the device had its IP. >>> >>>>>> When this situation occurs, what is output to the dmesg log? >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I don't have the output at hand but IIRC basically nothing special >>>>> occurred in dmesg. The interface even keeps it's IP although the wireless >>>>> was long gone. >>>> >>>> So ifconfig shows the IP#. I'm assuming that it no longer shows a >>>> state of "UP". >>> >>> I would assume so, but I'll have to reproduce to make sure. >>> >>>> This'd seem an inane question, but I must ask: What exactly do you >>>> mean by the wireless being "gone"? Which GUI/utility/effect do you >>>> see? Is it a powered-down AP, roaming, iwconfig's output, or what? >>> >>> I pulled the power from the AP. :) >>> >>>>> Ccing Ali Bahar to this reply, since he has seen something similar. >>>> >>>> To clarify: I just meant that I've seen quite a number of similar >>>> inconsistencies in my testing as well as in my analysis of the code. >>>> So, when I read your post, it came as no surprise to me. These'll get >>>> fixed ... uh, let's hope soon! ;-) >>> >>> I see. :) >> >> Please post your wpa_supplicant.conf. In particular, what is the value for >> scan_ssid? > > ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant > eapol_version=1 > ap_scan=2 > > network={ > ssid="" > id_str="" > priority=5 > proto=RSN > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > psk= > } > > Should I try again with scan_ssid=1 ? From reading the man page this > makes a difference if the ssid is hidden, which is not the case. Yes. It also changes the scan behavior. Larry