Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:35505 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751508Ab1GTSKw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:10:52 -0400 To: Daniel Drake Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, dcbw@redhat.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] libertas: reimplement mesh channel selection References: <20110720165403.52B629D401C@zog.reactivated.net> From: Kalle Valo Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:10:50 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20110720165403.52B629D401C@zog.reactivated.net> (Daniel Drake's message of "Wed\, 20 Jul 2011 17\:54\:03 +0100 \(BST\)") Message-ID: <87hb6gu8k5.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20110720_201055_514173_1E766668) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Daniel Drake writes: > This reimplements code allowing for mesh channel selection according > to how NetworkManager expects. [...] > +static const iw_handler mesh_iw_handler[] = > +{ > + IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWNAME, (iw_handler) mesh_get_name), > + IW_HANDLER(SIOCGIWFREQ, (iw_handler) mesh_get_freq), > + IW_HANDLER(SIOCSIWFREQ, (iw_handler) mesh_set_freq), > +}; We are trying to remove wext code, not add it. I'm surprised to see this. -- Kalle Valo