Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:40722 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751283Ab1GWU5L (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:57:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20110723165710.jso0g99twk80gcsg-cebfxv@webmail.spamcop.net> (sfid-20110723_225734_815143_2CF3C8B6) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:57:10 -0400 From: Pavel Roskin To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Sedat Dilek Cc: "John W. Linville" , Nick Kossifidis , ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath5k: merge ath5k_hw and ath5k_softc References: <20110715002155.14332.3527.stgit@mj.roinet.com> <4E2733BC.3070309@gnu.org> <20110720200004.GB18231@tuxdriver.com> <20110720175918.5diz6j1a9a8sk04w-cebfxv@webmail.spamcop.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Quoting Sedat Dilek : > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: >> The remaining changes are minimal and will be submitted separately. > > Just a friendly reminder for the missing part v2 -> v3. It sits in my stgit queue. It just didn't gather the critical mass to be submitted. The cleanup of the includes should be more systematic. When I see the headers, I always find something more important to clean up than the includes. As for renaming the functions, I think it can create some confusion. We have too many functions with "init" and start" in their names. It's hard to distinguish ath_init_hw from ath_init_ah. I want to make sure that the new names would stand out. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin