Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:51493 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754934Ab1HWPJV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:09:21 -0400 Received: by yxj19 with SMTP id 19so154998yxj.19 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:09:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110823134932.GB9770@tuxdriver.com> References: <1313250844-4526-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <20110823134932.GB9770@tuxdriver.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:09:20 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110823_170925_304124_22888B4E) Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: HT-PHY: init: add missing small-tables writes From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: "John W. Linville" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 23 sierpnia 2011 15:49 użytkownik John W. Linville napisał: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:45:51PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> W dniu 13 sierpnia 2011 17:54 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki >> napisał: >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki >> > --- >> > John: this one depends on >> > [RFC][PATCH] b43: HT-PHY: allow writing longer tables with a single call >> > , please apply the one above. >> >> John, I've asked you to apply the mentioned patch before this one. By >> applying *just* this one you've broken build for ppl trying *BROKEN* >> HT support. > > Please, _please_, _PLEASE_ stop doing this.  I process a lot of > patches, and sometimes I will miss these directives. > > If your patch is not RFC, then don't post it as RFC.  If you post > a patch as "Request For Comment" and I don't have any comments, > I'm going to delete it.  If you later decide it is no longer RFC, > then I've probably already deleted it.  So you need to re-post the > patch as just "PATCH". > > I no longer have "b43: HT-PHY: allow writing longer tables with a > single call".  If it is needed, then you need to repost it. Sorry, I didn't know about this "RFC" rule. I expected patch to be applied after spending a few days without comments. Will re-send in the future. -- Rafał