Return-path: Received: from mail-yi0-f46.google.com ([209.85.218.46]:41181 "EHLO mail-yi0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752272Ab1HNCsv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Aug 2011 22:48:51 -0400 Received: by yie30 with SMTP id 30so2714572yie.19 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 19:48:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E4686C5.4060402@t-online.de> References: <1313234481.2052.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4E4686C5.4060402@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:48:51 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20110814_044853_939173_076ACB1B) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Packet loss regression with Atheros AR9280 From: Adrian Chadd To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Richard_Sch=FCtz?= Cc: Jan Sundman , robert@ocallahan.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 13 August 2011 22:14, Richard Sch?tz wrote: > It looks like I'm having the same issue with an AR9285. In my university's > wireless network the packet loss is noticeable higher with power management > enabled. But at home everything is fine. Can you please file a kernel bugzilla report for this, so it doesn't get lost? Adrian