Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:51941 "EHLO mail-pz0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430Ab1HTNby convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:31:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E4FAFB7.4050207@bfs.de> References: <20110818133809.GG4786@shale.localdomain> <4E4FAFB7.4050207@bfs.de> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:31:53 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110820_153203_907743_89E69032) Subject: Re: [patch -next] bcma: signedness bug in bcma_get_next_core() From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: wharms@bfs.de Cc: Dan Carpenter , "open list:BROADCOM SPECIFIC..." , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 20 sierpnia 2011 14:59 użytkownik walter harms napisał: > > > Am 20.08.2011 14:23, schrieb Rafał Miłecki: >> W dniu 18 sierpnia 2011 15:38 użytkownik Dan Carpenter >> napisał: >>> The u32 would never be less than zero so the error handling would >>> break.  I changed it to int. >> >> In declaration we use s32: >> static s32 bcma_erom_get_mst_port(struct bcma_bus *bus, u32 **eromptr); >> >> Doesn't it sound better to use s32 instead of int? >> > > aktualy int sounds better that s32 for me. Will you care to replace function return type as well? -- Rafał