Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:49804 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751884Ab1HKQPO (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:15:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:04:24 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Larry Finger , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC][RFT][PATCH V2 2/2] b43: fix DMA on some bugged hardware Message-ID: <20110811160424.GC2566@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20110811_181524_983419_55C39C37) References: <1313001339-11211-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1313001339-11211-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <4E435D0E.80702@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > W dniu 11 sierpnia 2011 06:39 użytkownik Larry Finger > napisał: > > On 08/10/2011 07:14 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> > >> W dniu 10 sierpnia 2011 20:35 użytkownik Rafał Miłecki > >>  napisał: > >>> > >>> Some hardware with 64-bit DMA uses lower address word for setting > >>> routing (translation) bit. Add workaround for such boards. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > >>> --- > >>> This requires testing on at least 1 normal 64-bit DMA card and 1 32-bit > >>> DMA card. So far it was tested only on my 14e4:4329 where it fixed DMA. > >> > >> 14e4:4353 (BCM43224), 64-bit DMA, still works :) > >> > >> The rest will follow tomorrow. > > > > Tested with 14e4:4311 (64-bit) and 14e4:4318 (32-bit). The ssb changes were > > also tested with b43legacy. > > Thanks Larry. > > I've additionally tested this on 14e4:4312 (BCM4311), 32-bit DMA. Works OK. > > John: please take this patchset. Are these fixes intended for 3.1? -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.