Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:55637 "EHLO mail-pz0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751792Ab1HQLeR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:34:17 -0400 Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so944149pzk.1 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:34:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:34:16 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110817_133420_518029_C5D38BD7) Subject: Question about versions: wl vs. brcmsmac From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: brudley@broadcom.com, henryp@broadcom.com, rvossen@broadcom.com, arend@broadcom.com, frankyl@broadcom.com, kanyan@broadcom.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hey Broadcom, I've compare dump from wl with dump from brcmsmac and noticed some differences. Some random ones for LCN PHY: 1) brcmsmac doesn't touch 0x663 register in PHY init 2) wl uses 0xfedb, brcmsmac uses 0xfe4b as some value for 0xb table 3) brcmsmac uses 0x3 instead 0x0 for radio reg 0x38 and so on... My question is, which driver includes newer (more correct I hope) code? I'm comparing brcmsmac from git with wl 5.100.82.38. -- Rafał