Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:52734 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752129Ab1H3Jlm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 05:41:42 -0400 Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so3212829wwe.1 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:41:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20110830064137.GA4719@ecki> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:11:40 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20110830_114145_426972_99387A07) Subject: Re: ath9k: irq storm after suspend/resume From: Mohammed Shafi To: Clemens Buchacher Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, beta992@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > yes it is, though not a good idea, just thinking of we could get some > thing by not setting SC_OP_INVALID flag in ath_pci_probe(it was added > to fix a panic, but it did not cause panic for me now). sorry please don't try it, not setting the SC_OP_INVALID flag in ath_pci_probe, the system did panic. > >> >> ? ? ? ?if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return IRQ_NONE; >>