Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.212.42]:57807 "EHLO mail-vw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933142Ab1INUSw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:18:52 -0400 Received: by vwl1 with SMTP id 1so3338631vwl.1 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <400C43189542CE41BC0A5B252FC90136BC0C9DEF38@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> References: <20110913174444.GG11772@tuxdriver.com> <400C43189542CE41BC0A5B252FC90136BC0C9DEF38@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:18:51 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110914_221900_585696_5D273446) Subject: Re: About the patch: "staging: brcm80211: only enable brcmsmac if bcma is not set" From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Arend Van Spriel Cc: "John W. Linville" , Greg KH , Greg KH , Francis Moreau , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Michael Buesch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 14 września 2011 11:23 użytkownik Arend Van Spriel napisał: > For my bcma integration effort (which is already stale due to our brcmsmac cleanup) I simply took "wireless-next" bcma using meld. Was surprised that I also needed to do this for ssb as there are some include dependencies. In early bcma discussions a strong preference was given (by Michael if I am correct) to keep bcma independent from ssb at the cost of some duplication. For include files this preference might be less strong, but I still think it is a good idea to have these chip interconnect bus drivers independent from each other. The code is independent, if some includes are not, that should be reported & fixed. -- Rafał