Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:47674 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182Ab1INNrE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:47:04 -0400 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so1394898gyg.19 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:47:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110914132751.GA2485@tuxdriver.com> References: <1315320530-2733-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@qca.qualcomm.com> <20110913173226.GF11772@tuxdriver.com> <20110914034922.GA23349@vmraj-lnx.users.atheros.com> <20110914132751.GA2485@tuxdriver.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:47:03 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20110914_154708_455709_284ABBF0) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_hw: Fix magnitude/phase coeff correction From: Adrian Chadd To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Rajkumar Manoharan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: .. and I wonder if there are any similar issues with AR9001/AR9002 series NICs. I see some reasonably funny behaviour with calibration (under freebsd, the calibration code is the same as ath9k) where the CRC error rates for the high MCS rates fluctuate quite a bit. I haven't bothered chasing it down as I've been busy chasing down TX interrupt issues. Adrian