Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:47835 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751113Ab1IVHhY (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 03:37:24 -0400 Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so1421505eya.19 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:37:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1316606772.3940.30.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1316082334-7664-1-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1316082334-7664-4-git-send-email-arik@wizery.com> <1316606772.3940.30.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> From: Arik Nemtsov Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:37:08 +0300 Message-ID: (sfid-20110922_093727_368024_11C1C0E0) Subject: Re: [RFC 3/5] nl80211/mac80211: allow adding TDLS peers as stations To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Kalyan C Gaddam Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 15:06, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:25 +0300, Arik Nemtsov wrote: >> When a TDLS peer STA is added it is marked with a new flag in both >> nl80211 and in mac80211. > > I think it'd make some sense to allow only TDLS stations on a managed > mode interface? Yea i'll add the check. Arik