Return-path: Received: from bues.ch ([80.190.117.144]:37653 "EHLO bues.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752461Ab1IVKjJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 06:39:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:38:56 +0200 From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Arend Van Spriel , Hauke Mehrtens , Brett Rudley , Greg KH , "John W. Linville" , "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" , "gregkh@suse.de" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] staging: brcm80211: 7th reaction for mainline patch #2 Message-ID: <20110922123856.1159e258@milhouse> (sfid-20110922_123915_365582_4A4D8B9F) In-Reply-To: References: <1316467568-27683-1-git-send-email-frankyl@broadcom.com> <20110920130338.GA9885@kroah.com> <20110920132203.GB7800@tuxdriver.com> <20110920140020.GA11386@kroah.com> <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DD85@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DE4F@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <4E7AD9E6.1010700@hauke-m.de> <400C43189542CE41BC0A5B252FC90136BC0CC8ABD8@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:08:11 +0200 Rafał Miłecki wrote: > If we assume we will have the same level support in both drivers soon, > then what are the differences? brcmsmac seems to be preferred only > because Broadcom guys like it. Guys, can we _please_ get back to a technical discussion? -- Greetings, Michael.