Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:60180 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754940Ab1I3LVq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:21:46 -0400 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so1197769vws.19 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 04:21:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E8468AF.8000006@neratec.com> References: <1125417094.1836.1317285426615.JavaMail.root@idefix> <4E8468AF.8000006@neratec.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:21:45 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20110930_132154_040095_FD456869) Subject: Re: Regulatory revamp status From: Adrian Chadd To: Zefir Kurtisi Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless , Boris Presman , Assaf Azulay , Michael Green , David Quan , Kevin Hayes , Arun Venkataraman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 29 September 2011 20:46, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: > Really? Where would be 'there' countrycode-wise? > > That would definitely break today's CRDA capabilities :-\ I -think- one or both of ETSI/FCC have different CAC/NOL requirements for the channels which overlap the weather radars. At least when someone took FreeBSD to get DFS certified a while ago, the weather radar ranges were checked against a 30 minute CAC. :) I think it's worth defining specific DFS parameters for each frequency range. That's what I'll be doing for FreeBSD when I revamp its net80211 regulatory database code. Adrian