Return-path: Received: from mail.neratec.ch ([80.75.119.105]:50769 "EHLO mail.neratec.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756073Ab1I2Mqm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:46:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4E8468AF.8000006@neratec.com> (sfid-20110929_144646_082777_A4B48043) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:46:39 +0200 From: Zefir Kurtisi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd CC: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless , Boris Presman , Assaf Azulay , Michael Green , David Quan , Kevin Hayes , Arun Venkataraman Subject: Re: Regulatory revamp status References: <1125417094.1836.1317285426615.JavaMail.root@idefix> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/29/2011 01:45 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 29 September 2011 16:37, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: >> Thanks for the update. >> >> To me it looks not reasonable to mix in between the two approaches: either we assume countrycodes use the same DFS region for all channels, or each channel/band needs to have its own. Otherwise I feel that a DFS region bitmap would give a semi-flexible compromise that might end up being insufficient to represent some fancy countrycodes. > > There's some funny stuff in there. > > For example, some of the DFS bands have different CAC/NOL timing. :-) > > > > Adrian Really? Where would be 'there' countrycode-wise? That would definitely break today's CRDA capabilities :-\ Zefir