Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:53307 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752018Ab1ITXvZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:51:25 -0400 Received: by bkbzt4 with SMTP id zt4so928759bkb.19 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:51:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1316558247-10018-8-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> References: <1316558247-10018-1-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> <1316558247-10018-8-git-send-email-wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> From: Daniel Halperin Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:51:04 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20110921_015129_113834_C7407CE8) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] iwlagn: pending frames musn't be incremented if agg is on To: Wey-Yi Guy Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Emmanuel Grumbach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Wey-Yi Guy wrote: > > From: Emmanuel Grumbach > > During my works on the transport layer I removed code that updated > a local variable (is_agg) that is needed to keep the pending_frames > count up to date. Fix this. Seems like a big bug. Is this a bugfix for a patch earlier in the series or a patch that's already been accepted. If the former, why not merge? If the latter, why not CC'ed as a fix to an earlier version of the kernel? Dan