Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:52709 "EHLO
	mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751774Ab1IZWMs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:12:48 -0400
Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so4053289eya.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E80F522.3010903@lwfinger.net>
References: <CAJTrwG5M5QtS_jw-WmbSb5_NT+m6JcBD0uHCyUzEYhn94G3rkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTrwG5eELbDuGFXU4=3gSunPSkKLFvcpSe6gGE_Wc0s5BXZ+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTrwG7tzDHxDha5x8r-GJFK=oUE6Zk5zqpN4z4L2LyAD=DueQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317050380.1958.13.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG46qRYvda1vcCZXv0BTUyf26gx2qgpNgOG-bm-BCMpqfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317053131.1958.15.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<C5A7FB31FD9AEA42B600BDC3C74F8E0017052223@orsmsx511.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<CAJTrwG5AvbtNRZi54tzAoUDv5X9QLVY3L=-OgHYRtnJ-RMesrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317062004.1958.18.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG57r-B-eT-FODsDW1UgoVcS68zcUWo1mOrdHRdoXtNmCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<C5A7FB31FD9AEA42B600BDC3C74F8E001705253B@orsmsx511.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<CAJTrwG5MXfixhnNPOdoA3-DYEeKpC==uv4WvE78ZE5U+A10T7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317071501.2400.10.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
	<CAJTrwG6_ybjD9u2zMi+bY73j6CZoncbmOzk8N2N=8Cd=EWLUcA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317071853.2400.11.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
	<CAJTrwG5ydoheYzYuRZaaR0AfqBgE9KnfYQ8X_0esRNVog3hF=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E80F522.3010903@lwfinger.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:12:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJTrwG6r2ZEUg8VugVxDQ_AKL6_ukdregydm-_r9SjUMNbwBHQ@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110927_001251_627247_F4055A42)
Subject: Re: iwlagn: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 AGN" and "AVM Fritz!Box
 (7390)" incompatible
From: Henrik Friedrichsen <hrkfdn@gmail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Larry Finger
<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> wrote:
> Of course, it should take a little over 4 sec. Try adding the -D switch to
> the ping command. Does repeating the ping command immediately change the
> timing?

There you go:
~ > ping -Dc5 fritz.box
PING fritz.box (192.168.178.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
[1317074796.140468] 64 bytes from fritz.box (192.168.178.1):
icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=1.19 ms
[1317074804.154425] 64 bytes from fritz.box (192.168.178.1):
icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=1.52 ms
[1317074812.165947] 64 bytes from fritz.box (192.168.178.1):
icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=1.20 ms
[1317074820.177252] 64 bytes from fritz.box (192.168.178.1):
icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=1.23 ms
[1317074828.187470] 64 bytes from fritz.box (192.168.178.1):
icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=1.76 ms

Nope, it doesn't.