Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:51737 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753431Ab1IPOB2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:01:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: properly assign a boolean type From: Johannes Berg To: mohammed Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4E7354D8.40507@qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1316180020-9982-1-git-send-email-mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com> <1316180237.4130.37.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4E7354D8.40507@qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:01:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1316181679.4130.38.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20110916_160131_258873_2483120E) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 19:23 +0530, mohammed wrote: > >> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static bool __rfkill_set_hw_state(struct rfkill *rfkill, > >> else > >> rfkill->state&= ~RFKILL_BLOCK_HW; > >> *change = prev != blocked; > >> - any = rfkill->state& RFKILL_BLOCK_ANY; > >> + any = !!(rfkill->state& RFKILL_BLOCK_ANY); > > > > I believe this is not necessary since "any" is a "bool" and as such > > should cast correctly to 0/1. > I agree the older one works perfectly fine. I stumbled upon this when i > was trying to understand rfkill. but will not this change make it look > better ? if it looks like a too trivial please drop it. Thanks! Sure, whatever, I don't care; we can change it, but I think it'll generate exactly the same code :) johannes