Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:54234 "EHLO
	mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751493Ab1IZVVc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:21:32 -0400
Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so4012190eya.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1317071501.2400.10.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
References: <CAJTrwG5M5QtS_jw-WmbSb5_NT+m6JcBD0uHCyUzEYhn94G3rkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTrwG47wxJMjxo9_gtwut0w17FS2Qz7BOBPc2XCLo39M7WvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317048872.2400.4.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
	<CAJTrwG5CQKn9=1=HUDX1L5PsFbGws_zK1DTvot9i=KcMX7SwkQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317049160.1958.8.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG5eELbDuGFXU4=3gSunPSkKLFvcpSe6gGE_Wc0s5BXZ+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTrwG7tzDHxDha5x8r-GJFK=oUE6Zk5zqpN4z4L2LyAD=DueQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317050380.1958.13.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG46qRYvda1vcCZXv0BTUyf26gx2qgpNgOG-bm-BCMpqfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317053131.1958.15.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<C5A7FB31FD9AEA42B600BDC3C74F8E0017052223@orsmsx511.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<CAJTrwG5AvbtNRZi54tzAoUDv5X9QLVY3L=-OgHYRtnJ-RMesrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317062004.1958.18.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG57r-B-eT-FODsDW1UgoVcS68zcUWo1mOrdHRdoXtNmCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<C5A7FB31FD9AEA42B600BDC3C74F8E001705253B@orsmsx511.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<CAJTrwG5MXfixhnNPOdoA3-DYEeKpC==uv4WvE78ZE5U+A10T7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317071501.2400.10.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:21:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJTrwG6_ybjD9u2zMi+bY73j6CZoncbmOzk8N2N=8Cd=EWLUcA@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110926_232135_874120_89825341)
Subject: Re: iwlagn: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 AGN" and "AVM Fritz!Box
 (7390)" incompatible
From: Henrik Friedrichsen <hrkfdn@gmail.com>
To: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Hello Wey,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:11 PM, wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> wrote:
> Henrik. what kind of traffic you are running? what I see from the log,
> there are not many aggregated frames, (what I mean is I do not see a lot
> of BA in the log) which is very different from what I am test here. also
> I see the retry ratio is high in the aggregated frame compare to what I
> have here.

It's nothing big really. The router is not yet connected to the
internet, so I am mainly just opening the webpanel of the router or
ping it.