Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:36662 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750772Ab1IVGgP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 02:36:15 -0400 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so1718567wwf.1 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:36:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DF19@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> References: <1316467568-27683-1-git-send-email-frankyl@broadcom.com> <20110920130338.GA9885@kroah.com> <20110920132203.GB7800@tuxdriver.com> <20110920140020.GA11386@kroah.com> <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DD85@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DE4F@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20110922003523.0bf6a460@milhouse> <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DE92@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20110922012851.2f3b7801@milhouse> <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DF19@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:36:14 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20110922_083618_824765_D6C3455D) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] staging: brcm80211: 7th reaction for mainline patch #2 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: Brett Rudley Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_B=C3=BCsch?= , Greg KH , "John W. Linville" , "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" , "gregkh@suse.de" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: W dniu 22 września 2011 04:07 użytkownik Brett Rudley napisał: >> > We did however initially propose (and implement) a dividing line of ssb >> chips for b43 and AXI based chips for brcmsmac but b43 team chose to >> ignore/reject that. >> >> Well, what about embedded, for instance? > > I was referring to smac. There isn't any controversy over fmac AFAIK. I was question about embedded devices like routers I believe. -- Rafał