Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:35173 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752715Ab1I2LpF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:45:05 -0400 Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so503225yxl.19 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:45:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1125417094.1836.1317285426615.JavaMail.root@idefix> References: <1125417094.1836.1317285426615.JavaMail.root@idefix> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:45:04 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20110929_134509_380070_01216667) Subject: Re: Regulatory revamp status From: Adrian Chadd To: Zefir Kurtisi Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless , Boris Presman , Assaf Azulay , Michael Green , David Quan , Kevin Hayes , Arun Venkataraman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 29 September 2011 16:37, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: > Thanks for the update. > > To me it looks not reasonable to mix in between the two approaches: either we assume countrycodes use the same DFS region for all channels, or each channel/band needs to have its own. Otherwise I feel that a DFS region bitmap would give a semi-flexible compromise that might end up being insufficient to represent some fancy countrycodes. There's some funny stuff in there. For example, some of the DFS bands have different CAC/NOL timing. :-) Adrian