Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:33363 "EHLO
	mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752401Ab1IZVDA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:03:00 -0400
Received: by eya28 with SMTP id 28so3996016eya.19
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C5A7FB31FD9AEA42B600BDC3C74F8E001705253B@orsmsx511.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CAJTrwG5M5QtS_jw-WmbSb5_NT+m6JcBD0uHCyUzEYhn94G3rkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTrwG47wxJMjxo9_gtwut0w17FS2Qz7BOBPc2XCLo39M7WvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317048872.2400.4.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
	<CAJTrwG5CQKn9=1=HUDX1L5PsFbGws_zK1DTvot9i=KcMX7SwkQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317049160.1958.8.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG5eELbDuGFXU4=3gSunPSkKLFvcpSe6gGE_Wc0s5BXZ+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTrwG7tzDHxDha5x8r-GJFK=oUE6Zk5zqpN4z4L2LyAD=DueQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317050380.1958.13.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG46qRYvda1vcCZXv0BTUyf26gx2qgpNgOG-bm-BCMpqfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317053131.1958.15.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<C5A7FB31FD9AEA42B600BDC3C74F8E0017052223@orsmsx511.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<CAJTrwG5AvbtNRZi54tzAoUDv5X9QLVY3L=-OgHYRtnJ-RMesrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1317062004.1958.18.camel@wwguy-huron>
	<CAJTrwG57r-B-eT-FODsDW1UgoVcS68zcUWo1mOrdHRdoXtNmCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<C5A7FB31FD9AEA42B600BDC3C74F8E001705253B@orsmsx511.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:02:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJTrwG5MXfixhnNPOdoA3-DYEeKpC==uv4WvE78ZE5U+A10T7Q@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20110926_230304_575610_EB0D1D53)
Subject: Re: iwlagn: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 AGN" and "AVM Fritz!Box
 (7390)" incompatible
From: Henrik Friedrichsen <hrkfdn@gmail.com>
To: "Venkataraman, Meenakshi" <meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Hey Meenakshi,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Venkataraman, Meenakshi
<meenakshi.venkataraman@intel.com> wrote:
> [MV] You're running Windows using the same card (6205), right? Also, have you ever seen good performance with your 6205 on your Linux system? What about with a different AP?

That's correct. On Windows the problem does not occur with that
particular router. Also I don't think I have had comparable problems
with other routers, at least not in my home (not on Linux, either).
I'm using a different AP right now and it works just fine.