Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:39307 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754437Ab1ITIuQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 04:50:16 -0400 Received: by wyg34 with SMTP id 34so268477wyg.19 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:50:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87litjipda.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <1316347394-21276-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1316408970.2157.9.camel@cumari> <87aaa0k0a1.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <87litjipda.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> From: Ohad Ben-Cohen Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:49:55 +0300 Message-ID: (sfid-20110920_105020_574756_DA218D74) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add ieee80211_set_dyn_ps_timeout() To: Kalle Valo Cc: Eliad Peller , Luciano Coelho , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > IIRC Juuso added ieee80211_enable/disable_dyn_ps() to make it possible > use BT COEX with wl12xx. A lot has happened since then :) The wl12xx firmware today is vastly different and much improved. > Now you are saying that you actually want the opposite? Yes. The firmware is now capable of doing coex without enforcing PSM. This leads to a much better WLAN TP while BT is on. > But nevertheless I'm not still convinced that doing all this in > mac80211 is the right thing. Especially that this seems to be very > wl12xx specific, right? Not really, why do you consider this wl12xx specific more than any other hw offloading or mac80211 API that is used by a single driver ?