Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:65362 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756412Ab1JRHFi (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:05:38 -0400 Received: by yxp4 with SMTP id 4so284521yxp.19 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:05:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20111018064459.GA1442@ecki> References: <20111003084823.GA1521@ecki.lan> <20111004181534.GA1502@ecki> <20111005062528.GA1403@ecki> <20111015093902.GA23520@ecki> <20111018064459.GA1442@ecki> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:05:38 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20111018_090542_161778_9960684C) Subject: Re: ath9k: irq storm after suspend/resume From: Adrian Chadd To: Clemens Buchacher Cc: Mohammed Shafi , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hm, which version of the AR9285 is it, exactly? Would you just do a quick check (or code hack) and see if it matches the AR_SREV_9285SE_20 (or similar) macro? (I see a WAR in the reference code for that particular model AR9285, that isn't in ath9k.) I'm honestly still not convinced that it's (soley) the AR9285. You _could_ do something naughty like disabling all interrupts and then powering off the NIC (but not detaching it from the bus glue, like unloading the module does.) Good luck, Adrian