Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:45525 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932791Ab1JDRDL (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:03:11 -0400 Received: by ywb5 with SMTP id 5so698437ywb.19 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201110041842.05218.chunkeey@googlemail.com> References: <1317637758-11907-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <201110041726.40722.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <201110041842.05218.chunkeey@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 01:03:10 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20111004_190314_961063_2F0A1D36) Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection From: Adrian Chadd To: Christian Lamparter Cc: Zefir Kurtisi , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com, nbd@openwrt.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Nope, what I'm saying is that someone's likely just copy/paste'd the "we support x and y!" from some marketing material and then suggested people use linux/openwrt/ath9k without really looking at it. There were plenty of people advertising the AR9160 as a "3x3 MIMO" when it's a 2x2 stream device with 3 antennas. I know this confused me when I started tinkering with wifi stuff. Anyway, we're getting off-track here. Adrian