Return-path: Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:51355 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932231Ab1JEWbj (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:31:39 -0400 Received: by qadb15 with SMTP id b15so1629494qad.19 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:31:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1317637758-11907-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <201110032124.53937.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <201110041538.12885.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <4E8B157F.2080203@neratec.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:31:19 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20111006_003143_107901_92D1332F) Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] ath9k: enable DFS pulse detection To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Zefir Kurtisi , Christian Lamparter , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com, nbd@openwrt.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. erm, how complicated is the pattern matching code when it's compiled? > > The port of the fusion radar detection module didn't end up being all that big. Adrian, please keep terms like "fusion codebase" out of public lists. Luis