Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:58835 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354Ab1JVRoW (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:44:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nl80211: Add probe response offload attribute From: Johannes Berg To: Guy Eilam Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: (sfid-20111022_194251_250668_CCEB8E51) References: <1319289112-21896-1-git-send-email-guy@wizery.com> <1319290457.3956.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1319290618.3956.6.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1319305186.3956.11.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20111022_194251_250668_CCEB8E51) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:44:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1319305458.3956.12.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20111022_194424_551359_6ACBF921) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 19:42 +0200, Guy Eilam wrote: > > Yeah but if you add a wiphy flag and the bits into struct wiphy, then > > you can save the function pointer which seems nicer? > > You're absolutely right. > I'll send another version of the patch that will have a flag and > bitmap in the wiphy struct. Also I believe that means you don't need patch 2 at all so that's kinda nice :-) johannes