Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:60284 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853Ab1JCLKs (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 07:10:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4E899830.2070506@qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20111003_131051_122030_45ACEBBB) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:10:40 +0300 From: Kalle Valo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] ath6kl: Claim sdio function only at appropriate places References: <1317399419-3929-1-git-send-email-vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <1317399419-3929-1-git-send-email-vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/30/2011 07:16 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > There are places where tx_complete callbacks are called with > claiming the sdio function. It is not necessary to hold the > sdio func for longer. This may even affect the host side power > save, if it is supported by the controller. Applied, thanks. But in the future, please resend the whole patchset even when you modify just one patch. Resending invidividual patches from a patchset is error prone and most likely I will apply the wrong patch. Kalle