Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:61398 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753644Ab1KSXqv (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:46:51 -0500 Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so1372305vbb.19 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:46:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4EC72081.5020605@erley.org> References: <1320585006.11133.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <4EC72081.5020605@erley.org> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:46:50 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20111120_004655_024780_2E257955) Subject: Re: 802.11p implementation... From: Adrian Chadd To: Pat Erley Cc: Nick Kossifidis , Jan de Jongh , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Have you tested your half/quarter rate stuff against what other vendors are doing? (eg, the half/quarter rate support inside FreeBSD?) Adrian