Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61971 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753973Ab1KUHmo (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:42:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:44:56 +0100 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Pavel Roskin Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 45/77] iwlegacy: s/rx_reply/hdl/ Message-ID: <20111121074432.GA2787@redhat.com> (sfid-20111121_084251_206117_EEF71360) References: <1321604559-10707-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1321604559-10707-45-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <20111118180208.6a16e68c@mj> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20111118180208.6a16e68c@mj> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 06:02:08PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Why do you want it? For the same reason as in other patches - for make code shorter. >I understand rx_reply, Actually rx_reply is confusing name for interrupt handler. > but I don't understand > "hdl". Is it Hairy Definition Language? :) :-) it's shortcut from "handler", but you known it, don't you ? Stanislaw