Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5241 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754526Ab1KVMWR (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:22:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:22:06 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI Subject: Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1 Message-ID: <20111122122206.GD8397@redhat.com> (sfid-20111122_132242_967458_770E8391) References: <201111212249.31196.rjw@sisk.pl> <4ECB37E4.6020204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20111121215918.febd9fd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20111121215918.febd9fd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 09:59:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > grr, nothing in that patch's changelog indicates that it fixed a > regression nor that it fixed an infinite blockage of suspend. Well it's not a recent thing so I didn't flag it as a regression. It doesn't infinite block it, suspend works fine almost all the time (or it would have been noticed before), and if you've bad luck and it doesn't suspend the first time around like someone experienced, if you try again a bit later it'll work. > I moved it to my 3.2 queue, thanks. Thanks!