Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:49824 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756087Ab1KPLpH (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:45:07 -0500 Received: by vwl15 with SMTP id 15so533021vwl.19 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:45:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20111116111702.GB2191@redhat.com> References: <20111116100915.GA2191@redhat.com> <20111116111702.GB2191@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:45:06 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20111116_124512_302027_205DFA3C) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2800pci: handle spurious interrupts From: Ivo Van Doorn To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Gertjan van Wingerde , Helmut Schaa , Amir Hedayaty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:14:41AM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: >> > I changed rt2800pci only because get bug report for that device, not >> > sure if similar changes are not needed for other rt2x00 PCI devices. >> >> The ticket mentiones that the end-result is a slow connection, >> this is also a bug in older chipsets. So could you prepare a patch >> for the other drivers as well? > Yes, sure. Do you have handy links to bug reports that I could > reference in the changelog? Not really, I think most complains were on the mailinglist. There are probably some bugreports, but I am not sure if that was the kernel bugzilla, or on one of the distributions bugzilla's. Ivo