Return-path: Received: from mail.neratec.ch ([80.75.119.105]:34832 "EHLO mail.neratec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933814Ab1KCQZ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:25:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4EB2C073.7080101@neratec.com> (sfid-20111103_172531_578028_79B617D4) Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:25:23 +0100 From: Zefir Kurtisi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mohammed Shafi CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com, nbd@openwrt.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] ath9k: add DFS radar pulse processing References: <1320328553-28066-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <1320328553-28066-2-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/03/2011 04:54 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: >> [...] >> +static bool postprocess_radar_event(struct ath_softc *sc, >> + struct ath_radar_data *are, struct dfs_radar_pulse *drp) > > ath9k_postprocess_radar_event would be better? > Ok (I don't mind, as it's static anyhow.).