Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:39966 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752280Ab1K1Iae (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:30:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mac80211: use timeout from addba resp From: Johannes Berg To: Nikolay Martynov Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1322432153-17425-1-git-send-email-mar.kolya@gmail.com> (sfid-20111127_231609_949056_E5E23CE4) References: <1322432153-17425-1-git-send-email-mar.kolya@gmail.com> (sfid-20111127_231609_949056_E5E23CE4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:30:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1322469030.4060.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20111128_093037_495201_C83EA893) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:15 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: > If other side sent us non zero timeout in addba response use it as a > timeout for TX session. Before this patch initiator and recipient > could have different timeouts if recipient decides to change timeout > offered by initiator. I'm not convinced this is correct, can you say where the standard says that we should take the recipient's timeout? The way I read it, the originator informs the recipient of its timeout, not the other way around, and we implement that in agg-rx. johannes