Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:44803 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754879Ab1K3OQo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:16:44 -0500 Received: by eaak14 with SMTP id k14so721707eaa.19 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:16:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1322641938.3982.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> References: <1322533625-24641-1-git-send-email-mar.kolya@gmail.com> <1322555084.4110.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1322579973.4110.22.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1322604877.11282.1.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1322606159.11282.2.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1322641938.3982.0.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:16:43 -0500 Message-ID: (sfid-20111130_151648_248497_7AF42156) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: reset addba retries after timeout From: Nikolay Martynov To: Johannes Berg Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2011/11/30 Johannes Berg : > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 17:46 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: > >> > Maybe the better approach would be to bump it up, but also only allow an >> > attempt once every say 15 seconds or so? It seems kinda useless to try 3 >> > (or 10/15) times in quick succession and then give up, vs. just trying >> > more spaced out? >> >> ? Makes sense to me. Although I would left first 2-3 go quickly in >> case first was lost due to random glitch there is no reason to wait 15 >> seconds. But if first 2-3 fail - it make sense split next apart, I >> think. > > Seems ok to me, want to implement it? :) Sure, I'll send patch for this. -- Truthfully yours, Martynov Nikolay. Email: mar.kolya@gmail.com