Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:22420 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752791Ab1KURBs (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:01:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:01:45 -0500 From: Pavel Roskin To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 45/77] iwlegacy: s/rx_reply/hdl/ Message-ID: <20111121120145.7820e4b2@mj> (sfid-20111121_180152_395772_2E04679E) In-Reply-To: <20111121074432.GA2787@redhat.com> References: <1321604559-10707-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1321604559-10707-45-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <20111118180208.6a16e68c@mj> <20111121074432.GA2787@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:44:56 +0100 Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 06:02:08PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > Why do you want it? > For the same reason as in other patches - for make code shorter. > > >I understand rx_reply, > Actually rx_reply is confusing name for interrupt handler. > > > but I don't understand > > "hdl". Is it Hairy Definition Language? :) > :-) it's shortcut from "handler", but you known it, don't you ? Actually, I had that idea after a while, but first I thought about something specific to Intel hardware. I was also thinking of SDL and MDL even though I knew both were irrelevant. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin