Return-path: Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:50515 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759737Ab1LOXNg (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:13:36 -0500 Message-ID: <1323990813.18292.2.camel@joe2Laptop> (sfid-20111216_001340_208811_8279905A) Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next] ath: Convert ath_dbg(bar, ATH_DBG_, to ath_dbg(bar, FOO From: Joe Perches To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Jouni Malinen , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:13:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1323989753.1270.19.camel@joe2Laptop> <1323990336.18122.1.camel@joe2Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 15:09 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > sed/emacs > > inspection of formats post sed. > Is it easy to run again at a later time or was it a bitch? Pretty trivial, but the format mods post coalescing (missing newlines, missing spaces) were eyeballed. Unless you've got a _lot_ of unqueued patches for wireless-next, I doubt the delta will be very high.