Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:40625 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753535Ab1LUTPd (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:15:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:02:11 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc) Message-ID: <20111221190211.GE11842@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20111221_201538_071042_1545EEED) References: <20111219185556.f07c1f43e28cfd594aaa5fe0@canb.auug.org.au> <4EEFA21B.5010305@xenotime.net> <1324399181.5354.0.camel@sortiz-mobl> <4EF23A1F.60803@xenotime.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4EF23A1F.60803@xenotime.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:57:19AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 12/20/2011 08:39 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > Hi Randy, > > > > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 12:44 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20111216: > >> > >> > >> (not new today, just not reported earlier) > > John applied my fix for this one. It should be fixed now. > > Hi Samuel, > > Is this supposed to be fixed in linux-next? > It still fails today (linux-next 20111221). > > > data.c:(.text+0x3e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' > data.c:(.text+0x400): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' > ntf.c:(.text+0xb60): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' > ntf.c:(.text+0xb80): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' > rsp.c:(.text+0x750): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' > rsp.c:(.text+0x770): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' > netlink.c:(.text+0x14e0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' > netlink.c:(.text+0x1500): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' > af_nfc.c:(.text+0xe0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' > af_nfc.c:(.text+0x100): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' > rawsock.c:(.text+0x1000): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' > rawsock.c:(.text+0x1020): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' I have this commit in wireless-next, been there a couple of days: commit 645d35902c8f05a1b12fa838aa9052d8eeaf161e Author: Samuel Ortiz Date: Fri Dec 16 15:03:36 2011 +0100 NFC: Fix LLCP related build failure llcp_mac routines should be static and inlined or build will fail with NFC selected without LLCP. This patch fixes: LD [M] net/nfc/nfc.o net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down': netlink.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here net/nfc/netlink.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up': netlink.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here net/nfc/af_nfc.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up': (.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down': rawsock.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_down' net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here net/nfc/rawsock.o: In function `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up': rawsock.c:(.text+0x10): multiple definition of `nfc_llcp_mac_is_up' net/nfc/core.o:(.text+0x10): first defined here Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz Signed-off-by: John W. Linville -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.