Return-path: Received: from calzone.tip.net.au ([203.10.76.15]:50994 "EHLO calzone.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752149Ab1LVBDx (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:03:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:03:43 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Samuel Ortiz , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linville@tuxdriver.com" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc) Message-Id: <20111222120343.32afd5524db3cfe8b3876892@canb.auug.org.au> (sfid-20111222_020410_858224_9B4FB536) In-Reply-To: <4EF28D6A.7080505@xenotime.net> References: <20111219185556.f07c1f43e28cfd594aaa5fe0@canb.auug.org.au> <4EEFA21B.5010305@xenotime.net> <1324399181.5354.0.camel@sortiz-mobl> <4EF23A1F.60803@xenotime.net> <1324500160.5354.3.camel@sortiz-mobl> <4EF2569D.1070806@xenotime.net> <1324510522.5354.5.camel@sortiz-mobl> <4EF28D6A.7080505@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA256"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__22_Dec_2011_12_03_43_+1100_O=Eoye=K3b+FTm5j" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Signature=_Thu__22_Dec_2011_12_03_43_+1100_O=Eoye=K3b+FTm5j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:52:42 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrot= e: > > On 12/21/2011 03:35 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:58 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 12/21/2011 12:42 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > >>> Hi Randy, > >>> > >>> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 11:57 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>>> On 12/20/2011 08:39 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > >>>>> Hi Randy, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 12:44 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>>>>> On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Changes since 20111216: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> (not new today, just not reported earlier) > >>>>> John applied my fix for this one. It should be fixed now. > >>>> > >>>> Hi Samuel, > >>>> > >>>> Is this supposed to be fixed in linux-next? > >>>> It still fails today (linux-next 20111221). > >>> Do you have a .config for me to look at ? > >> > >> Sure, one of several that failed is attached. > > Thanks, I just tried this one and it seems to work fine. What's your > > toolchain ? > > I'm using: gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) >=20 > I'm using: > > gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.5.2 >=20 > so maybe it is something that has been fixed in gcc... >=20 > Thanks for checking the config. Well, it would be interesting to know what tree Samuel was testing, because the fix commit was *not* in next-20111221 due to another error in the wireless-next tree ... That fix *should* be in today's linux-next since the fix for the other build problem is there. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__22_Dec_2011_12_03_43_+1100_O=Eoye=K3b+FTm5j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO8oHvAAoJEECxmPOUX5FEB2AP/1YAWL3U+/qLoUTTmn8vTZyX 0ow15ieiwVSbTjyVfsB2aI6mO2rB8p4ILW4eM7q1gX5xjdOFTyl0FfrY9Z14jqNw Gtp3jPY/BupfLm6Ed8sWP7nBswrg9117GUyepMZyT1h21cNty4f3tQKm+MGgsFi2 l0HvC3UXR7/sMcLHhls9y9BtJyW9GEFdXnmqK7+c/BFSEKGVXD9ceHZBvFM1SDlt 4y1anWIF9SLMjxS+t2Zk2f6APBTNdiqc0cwaf2aXnL5+EtSD9IQJmVUbFaxzsulx xluSO8oqwOr7yChLyizu3meWfwFa/licvTsvEtsI/OQ/VfzqAx8oGBH+xcHRsWVY NCuVGlCjHwXEDO3jSWjLOzFpRzFch4jF/b7bwC+vs9+2ABpRFIJEW9xCL90OVcWx ugJp6Bd/lj2qtuhUR/BBzzUJonV5j9peY1zOaw6DnKcBq0FCgaHzoQUNgv6w2zga 4XvX9xlm+B+Cid7StLRZUKWHeermYWu0Otm9pzwq/dyxC6iNa8AgCdvmf0E9txiT BCHBe9mxe7VyRLtcPoKmXQBxl9KV7MEJ0LV64djkRxdlZj2k0JX9oYBBa5890dVS QzUoW5ybtRiFzj733p5hsVlFJ8fB7Dg3nDBJ50ALjgShkTBXg6K5T9yRtknEmLQJ Epe62lMLvA/idFNEfZlZ =8s3L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__22_Dec_2011_12_03_43_+1100_O=Eoye=K3b+FTm5j--