Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:62170 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752202Ab1LPSzl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:55:41 -0500 Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so6691600wgb.1 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:55:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:55:40 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20111216_195544_801037_26C5D39E) Subject: [RFC] b43: Rearranging functions in phy_n.c From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: b43-dev Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hey, The order of functions in phy_n.c is really messy. I wanted to collect related functions, fix order (dependency) and name goups via comments. Is there anything I should know? Patches are going to be huge, tons of lines moved around the phy_n.c :( Are there any objections against that? Any suggestions if I should post one huge patch or few smaller ones? -- Rafał