Return-path: Received: from nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.254]:29628 "HELO nm16-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751761Ab2A1UXv (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:23:51 -0500 From: Marek Lindner To: Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: minstrel_ht should not override user supplied rts setting Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:23:44 +0800 Cc: Daniel Halperin , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <1327735027-30121-1-git-send-email-lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <201201290358.35433.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <4F245888.2070202@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: <4F245888.2070202@openwrt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201201290423.45141.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (sfid-20120128_212355_294935_966D0193) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday, January 29, 2012 04:20:24 you wrote: > On 2012-01-28 8:58 PM, Marek Lindner wrote: > >> I'm with Felix: I could see adding an option that means "force never > >> use RTS/CTS" but I think we're at the right operating point when > >> interpreting the standard "RTS/CTS threshold" option. > > > > Actually, this option exists already. It's just minstrel_ht overriding > > it: iw phy set rts > > Put special attention towards the "off" at the end. > > > > If we let the rate algorithm override our rts settings it should at least > > be communicated. I found no such mention anywhere. > > > > I'd like to further stress the point that no other rate algorithm does > > this. We create incoherent and hard to debug behavior. > > Which rate algorithms did you check to come to that conclusion? I just > looked at the ath9k rate control algorithm and it does the same ;) I checked net/mac80211/rc80211_* since that is where minstrel_ht is living. Regards, Marek