To: =?koi8-r?B?TW9oYW1tZWQgU2hhZmk=?= <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>
From: =?koi8-r?B?TVI=?= <g7af0ec1e3ea1e7b1@nextmail.ru>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"=?koi8-r?B?UmFqa3VtYXIgTWFub2hhcmFu?=" <rmanohar@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: =?koi8-r?B?UmU6IGF0aDlrIGNyYXNoIDMuMi1yYzc=?=
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:52:14 +0400
Message-ID: <NEXT-4f1447aef25ba4.25243669@nextmail.ru> (sfid-20120116_165236_719474_C4A6C83C)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org


 > Turned out I got lucky previous time.
 > 
 >This time I went to the other AP, spent some time under it, roamed back 
and
 >
 >WiFi didn't disappear. I didn't even lose XMPP connections in the 
process.
 >
 > 
 >Maybe debug printing (which prints a lot) managed to introduce some 
extra 
 > delays into some race condition.
 > 
 > I hope I will have time to test this more on Monday. Tomorrow I will be 
 > using WiFi less than usual.

Now I went a few time back and forth, spent a lot of time under previously 
risky AP and still there are no problems..

I wonder if maybe a congested AP could help.. But unclear how to obtain 
that quickly and reliably.