Return-path: Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]:60620 "EHLO mout0.freenet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750895Ab2AXV4U (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:56:20 -0500 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1RpoLh-0005sV-9c for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:56:17 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:57892 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1RpoLh-00005M-5L for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:56:17 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.21] (port=55768 helo=11.mx.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1RpoIb-0006pJ-4c for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:53:05 +0100 Received: from [2002:4fde:916:2:5054:ff:feb8:40bd] (port=48114 helo=mail.maya.org) by 11.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID andihartmann@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1RpoIa-0000mM-Mu for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:53:05 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1F2837.5090307@maya.org> (sfid-20120124_225624_236872_01C564FD) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:52:55 +0100 From: Andreas Hartmann MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Helmut Schaa CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ath9k get's completely knocked out by rt3572 device References: <4F1EF618.6080108@01019freenet.de> <13411135.eH6opTgxBo@helmutmobil.site> In-Reply-To: <13411135.eH6opTgxBo@helmutmobil.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Helmut Schaa schrieb: > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 19:19:04 schrieb Andreas Hartmann: >> - At the moment of stopping netperf on rt3572, the ath9k device >> instantly started sending / receiving data again as expected. > [...] >> Does anybody has an idea what could cause this situation? Or is this normal? > > Your netperf traffic is in the direction STA -> AP or also in the other > direction? In both directions (serially). It's a script, which does the following: while true do netperf -H host -t TCP_STREAM # (STA -> AP) netperf -H host -t TCP_MAERTS # (AP -> STA) netperf -H host -t TCP_SENDFILE # (STA -> AP) done Andreas